Baffinland iron ore mine expansion plan rejected

Date:

The board cited “significant adverse ecosystemic effects” on marine mammals such as narwhals, fish, caribou and other wildlife, which in turn could harm Inuit culture, as the main reason for the decision.

The company said it was both surprised and disappointed by the board’s decision.

“Our … proposal is based on years of in-depth study and detailed scientific analysis, and has considerable local support based on years of consultation with Inuit and local communities,” chief executive officer Brian Penney said in the statement.

“We will be asking the federal government to consider all of the evidence and input and to approve the … application with fair and reasonable conditions,” Penney noted.

Dan Vandal, the federal northern affairs minister, has 90 days to either side with the review board or the mining company, in which steel giant ArcelorMittal has a 28% stake. The rest of Baffinland is held by Nunavut Iron…

Read more…

Share post:

Subscribe

spot_imgspot_img

Popular

More like this
Related

Tampa RV giant Lazydays to delist from Nasdaq

Tampa-based Lazydays Holdings Inc., one of Florida’s most recognized...

Granite Geek: New Hampshire might get access to ‘balcony solar’

I had solar panels put on my roof six...

TSX Today: What to Watch for in Stocks on Monday, November 10

Despite firm gold and silver prices, Canadian stocks...

While BNB and DOT Struggle Under Market Pressure, BlockDAG’s Presale Soars Past $435M!

As market-wide fear grips the sector, the Binance Coin...