No guns for domestic abuse suspects, Supreme Court rules

Date:

Getty Images Crowd holding signs against domestic violence, Julianne Moore at podium with microphoneGetty Images

Actress Julianne Moore speaks outside the court during November arguments

People placed under restraining orders for suspected domestic violence do not have a right to own guns, the Supreme Court has ruled.

The 8-1 decision upholds a 30-year-old law that bars those with restraining orders for domestic abuse from owning firearms.

A lower court had struck down that federal statute as not “consistent with the nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation”.

Friday’s ruling marks a rare victory for firearms restrictions in the top court.

Chief Justice John Roberts delivered the majority opinion, with all but one of his colleagues in agreement.

The policy of disarming alleged domestic abusers is in line with “what common sense suggests”, he wrote.

“When an individual poses a clear threat of physical violence to another, the threatening individual may be disarmed,” he said.

Justice Clarence Thomas, arguably the most conservative…

Read more…

Share post:

Subscribe

spot_imgspot_img

Popular

More like this
Related

Tampa RV giant Lazydays to delist from Nasdaq

Tampa-based Lazydays Holdings Inc., one of Florida’s most recognized...

Granite Geek: New Hampshire might get access to ‘balcony solar’

I had solar panels put on my roof six...

TSX Today: What to Watch for in Stocks on Monday, November 10

Despite firm gold and silver prices, Canadian stocks...

While BNB and DOT Struggle Under Market Pressure, BlockDAG’s Presale Soars Past $435M!

As market-wide fear grips the sector, the Binance Coin...